On Fri November 10 2006 02:36, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:01:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Firstly, should we be pointing to the SuS instead of POSIX > > (there is work going on a new version of the SUS), since it is > > open, and readily available on th 'net, and people can readily see > > it (as opposed to people who have shelled out $500 for a version)? > > Very much agreed. I don't think Debian policy should mention non-free > documents, and certainly not documents unavailable to developers.
Sounds right, and proper, given Debian's focus on freeness. So, why POSIX... history, completeness? - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
