Frank Küster wrote:

> That's a nice exercise, but the interesting question is whether we
> actually have enough *packages* so that their creation makes sense. 

Quite frankly, I do not (yet) know if there is a need for each
subsection I listed, but there is no reason for not being forward
compatible. One thing sure is that we do have quite a lot of entries
(101) in "Science", so reorganizing them may be worth the effort.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to