Frank Küster wrote: > That's a nice exercise, but the interesting question is whether we > actually have enough *packages* so that their creation makes sense.
Quite frankly, I do not (yet) know if there is a need for each subsection I listed, but there is no reason for not being forward compatible. One thing sure is that we do have quite a lot of entries (101) in "Science", so reorganizing them may be worth the effort. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]