On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:51:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:40:06AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > > a note to the debian-policy folks: you may or may not be aware that > > we've done a significant amount of work regarding drafting a comprehensive > > and sensible policy for web servers and web applications. i don' think > > it's quite ready for submission (i think the unspoken assumption is that > > we'd submit it for etch+1, and after webapps-common was introduced into > > the archive), but your feedback on what we've come up with so far would > > be very much appreciated: > > > > http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ > > > Thanks for the pointer! > > Generally I would suggest that any subpolicy with the potential of > affecting a number of packages be discussed on debian-policy. >
I've asked for comments[0], but not received any yet. Neil [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2006/04/msg00014.html -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
