On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:21:55PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal, > > which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in > > your debian/control file, you must also implement build-arch and/or > > build-indep. > > > > Additionally, that has the advantage that most packages probably already > > implement it that way. > > There used to be the issue that the dpkg maintainers were strongly > opposed to that, because that break backward compatibility.
Yes, but only if packages who declare build-depends-indep without having build-arch exist. Anyone feel like finding that out? ;-) -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
