On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages > currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev. > Also, policy should be amended accordingly. > > The affected packages are: [...]
Hmm, I have a package that depends on makedev (pbbuttonsd) and I was wondering why it doesn't show up in your list? Maybe because it is powerpc only? Or is there a "real" reason why I shouldn't add an alternate dependency on udev? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
