Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:33:44 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels
2345 all same
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 22:18:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 15:18:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8mX1-0005GD-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:18:39 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-20-45.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.20.45]:4069
helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #0)
id 1E8mWz-00050J-8B by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 03:48:38 +0530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:09:46 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.2.1
Severity: wishlist
One wants to know the exact definition of each of the Debian run levels.
We see
9.3. System run levels and `init.d' scripts
9.3.1. Introduction
The `/etc/init.d' directory contains the scripts executed by `init' at
boot time and when the init state (or "runlevel") is changed (see
init(8)).
But the more general Linux man pages shouldn't be expected to have
each run level detailed clearer than in the Policy document.
Anyways, way below one finally finds
By default `update-rc.d' will start services in each of the multi-user
state runlevels (2, 3, 4, and 5) and stop them in the halt runlevel
(0), the single-user runlevel (1) and the reboot runlevel (6).
Well right at the top of 9.3.1 I would say what each run level is,
using one line to explain each runlevel, for a total of 0123456S = 8 lines.
Anyway, on other Linuxes, 3 is text:
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-html/Remote-Serial-Console-HOWTO/misc-init.html:
7.2. Change init level to textual
Alter the default from run level 5 (multiuser with X Window System) to
run level 3 (multiuser).
But on debian, level 2 3 4 5 are all the same, apparently, but
apparently by silent agreement. Policy should give some clue why they
are all the same, lest users wonder if they forgot to install text-mode
or something. "On other Linuxes, Policy is 3 is textmode, but on
Debian one cannot find any statements about this." Not in man inittab,
man init, /etc/inittab, etc.
Perhaps mention that "text mode" can be achieved by just disabling X
-- mention the best way then.
One might even save inodes by just linking rc5.d->rc2.d etc. Or just
having one of 2345 in the first place.
Anyways, "say something on why 2 3 4 5 are exactly the same on
Debian", or if it is cool for packages to casually claim a whole
runlevel for themselves and their friends or whatever.
At least mention something to people looking for Debian's "text mode."
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325234-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:35:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:35:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net ([12.107.230.171]
helo=glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqEEh-000876-Gi
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:35:19 -0800
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with
ESMTP id jBOIXiuL016682
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:33:44 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id
jBOIXiGh016681;
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:33:44 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345
all same
Organization: The Debian Project
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACYAAAAwCAMAAABKbPgaAAAAM1BMVEUAAADIjH/0rp1KPz79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X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051224:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::JUIxRhaiH5ajTapn:000000000000000000000000000000000000000sOSt
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051224:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::FXKIWA/3WUvOI5FT:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000070NMF
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051224:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::Yju+D7YsQXzHcil2:0000000000000000000000000000000004WT78
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:33:44 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Dan Jacobson's message of "Sat, 27
Aug 2005 04:09:46 +0800")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -27.1578
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: -27.1578 )
X-SA-Orig: -8.399, -27.1578
X-Spam-Value: -14.3522111111111
X-Grey: White
X-SA-Rep: -14.3522111111111 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.53 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
on 192.168.1.10
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
This is not something that policy should be driving.
manoj
--
GREAT MOMENTS IN HISTORY (#7): November 23, 1915 Pancake make-up is
invented; most people continue to prefer syrup.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
