Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:07:43 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-policy: Policy forbids account creation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 08:07:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 01:07:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de)
[217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQKap-0001Fn-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:07:07 -0700
Received: from lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.38])
by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1EQKam-0005QR-RQ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:07:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: Policy forbids account creation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:07:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: (-----) -5.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.2.1
Severity: normal
Policy 9.2.1 says:
Packages other than base-passwd must not modify /etc/passwd,
/etc/shadow, /etc/group or /etc/gshadow.
This makes, for example, the passwd package RC buggy since useradd
modifies /etc/passwd. Also exim4 is RC buggy since its maintainer
scripts modify /etc/passwd by calling adduser which in turn calls
useradd which in turn modifies /etc/passwd while not belonging to
base-passwd.
The section in the policy should say
Packages other than base-passwd must not modify /etc/passwd,
/etc/shadow, /etc/group or /etc/gshadow directly from their maintainer
scripts.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-zgsrv
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333862-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:15:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:15:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net ([12.107.230.171]
helo=glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqDvM-0006lZ-WD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:15:21 -0800
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with
ESMTP id jBOI7h54014839
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:07:43 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id
jBOI7h3K014838;
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:07:43 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-policy: Policy forbids account creation
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACYAAAAwCAMAAABKbPgaAAAAM1BMVEUAAADIjH/0rp1KPz79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X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051224:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::+tixHXilBWEDcLFv:00000000000000000000000000000000009uPU
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:07:43 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -30.0397
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: -30.0397 )
X-SA-Orig: -8.399, -30.0397
X-Spam-Value: -14.5123166666667
X-Grey: White
X-SA-Rep: -14.5123166666667 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.53 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
on 192.168.1.10
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
Umm, no, it does not. Policy consistently makes a distinction
between a package which performs some action is different from a
package which contains programs which perform the action -- otherwise
both nvi and vim are at risk for editing configuration files.
manoj
--
Alaska: A prelude to "No."
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
