On Fri, 02 Dec 2005, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Indeed, rpath is only acceptable for:
> >   1. dynamically loaded modules/plugins
> >   2. libraries that must live outside of ld.so directories
> 
> And these things might reasonably be searched for in
> /usr/local/lib/foo as well as /usr/lib/foo.

rpath is for the canon location of a library.  If someone wants something
searched, he puts it (in fact, I guess we already do for him) in ld.so.conf.

There is no legal, acceptable or even remotely sane reason for a rpath
pointing to /usr/local/* *IN SOMETHING PACKAGED BY DEBIAN*.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to