Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 10.1. Binaries > --------------
> Two different packages must not install programs with different > functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs > having the same functionality but different implementations is handled > via "alternatives" or the "Conflicts" mechanism. See Section 3.10, > So, it already *is* in a normative part of the document, it's just not > necessarily presented in the best order for readers to consume it. :/ Aha, thanks. I *knew* I'd read it somewhere, but I'd fooled myself into thinking I'd just read it in Appendix F. In that case, a cross-reference from where update-alteratives is talked about in 3.10 would be helpful, I think. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
