On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:45:06 +0100, Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Current policy says a controlling terminal is guaranteed to be
> available in the maintainer scripts. This is simply not true, for
> dpkg will happily run without one - which makes all scripts that
> make explicit use of /dev/tty (as policy recommends) fail with the
> error message '/dev/tty: No such device or address'.
The current practice is that maintainer scripts may depend on
a controlling tty. Sure, dpkg can be run without a controlling tty,
in which case things shall break. "Don't do that, then".
This can't just be simply changed without a trong reason to do
so, and without a plan on how the transition is to be affected.
manoj
--
Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money
bags. Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
