Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > x-www-browser isn't listed in virtual-packages-list, though. Maybe it > should be added. Would make sense IMHO. [ To be consequent, > text-www-browser would then make sense, too ...] > [...] > So is there a consensus to mass-file bugs to let all Browsers Provide: > www-browser (even mozilla-firebird) and additionally x-www-browser (and > maybe text-www-browser)?
Hmm. Except Julien nobody responded either on -devel or -policy... So should I file the bugs to let all provide www-browser and the respecive browsers provide text- and/or x-www-browser now? ( I'll just do it when there aren't objections on -devel since there seems to be a consensus when all people replying agree with me.. ) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
