On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:25:07PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote: > My understanding of the issue in the original post of this thread is > that situations can arrise where Debian policy forbids including some > package on a CD in a way that the poster thinks it should be > included.
Meh. They're hints at best, and not often useful. > Maybe there isn't a system that is completely 'fair' > to all packages. Likely. > Maybe it is not possible to be completely > 'fair'. You'd have to start by defining what it means to be 'fair'. Some packages suck, and I object to anything that tries to give them equal priority as less sucky packages. > Maybe its not worth the effort to try. I'd go with that. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
