On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:47:03PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > > I am offering a third patch that implement the Build-Options control > > > field proposal. > > > > I reject this proposal, until such time as the code has implemented it. > > > > hint: send patches to the bts for dpkg-dev > > So you are going to implement this even if the discussion is not already > closed. Of course you can implement it anyway, but it's unfair to ignore what > Branden Robinson asked: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Which is also of interest to me. You might have privately replyed, but in this > case i'd like the answare to be sent here for logging too.
I only reject the proposal, because the changes need to be implemented *first*, and tested, before policy tries to ram it down our throats. Policy already tried this once(in this exact case), and we have shown that it was not implementable. I don't want a repeat of that.
