On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > We had another discussion on where to put the contents of -doc packages > > separate from the bug report in which a degree of consensus was reached, > > but I can't seem to find it now. I'll keep searching... > > Thanks, I'm interested. > > Anyway that consensus isn't actually reflected in the current policy, is > it?
No. There are several issues involved that were discussed on several occasions over the years, but the main thing seems to be whether and in what amount is the extra /usr/share/doc/<package>-doc directory structure necessary. Some proposed moving -doc package copyright and changelog files into /usr/share/doc/<package>/<file>-doc or so. I think this breaks the consistency and should be resorted to only if we can't do anything better. Some proposed mandating that -doc package contents is placed into /usr/share/doc/<package>/, and that the administrivia such as copyright and changelog stays in /usr/share/doc/<package>-doc/. This sounds good to me because it has a sort of an internal logic, the -doc suffix only exists because of packaging, it's actually the docs for <package>. Plus, it's shorter, less to type. >From strolling the archives, I get the impression that the majority shares this sentiment, with one downside: someone might wander into the -doc/ dir and wonder where are the docs. This can be easily alleviated by placing a symlink from /usr/share/doc/<package>-doc/<package> to /usr/share/doc/<package>. I know that there are people who wouldn't like such an extra link, but I don't believe there are people who would actually object to making everything consistent just because they have to add an extra symlink. I would recommend that we have policy suggest ("may") the latter solution, and see how it goes from there. Any objections? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.