On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:40:34PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > Well, probably the main reason we haven't hit this before is that most > people don't bother to do a proper arch/indep split in their packages, > and just stuff everything into Build-Depends.
That is not true, look at bug #148932 On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:50:16AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > When I do it, I ignore what policy says and do what works. That means > the build target is a no-op (or possibly an alias for build-arch), and > everything else behaves as expected. Exactly my view. Personnally I just use build: build-arch binary-indep: build-indep It is a long time that all my multi-binary packages implement that. Cheers, Bill.
