On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 11:39:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
[Joey wrote]
> > > > > Most of the programs there are simulations of the real world (though
> > > > > achilles and matrem are a-life programs, and xlife seems to have been
> > > > > thrown in some reason). There are slow simulations like atc from
> > > > > bsdgames, realistic real-time simulations like flightgear and csmash
> > > > > and
> > > > > gtkpool
> > > >
> > > > There is a Games/Sports section defined as "games derived from "real
> > > > world" sports". I think csmash and gtkpool fit this criterium.
> > >
> > > I think the notion of games-slash-sports is kinda silly.
> > > Webster 1913 even lists "game" and "sport" as synonyms. :)
> > >
> > > IMHO gtkpool fits just fine in Games/Simulation and the Policy should
> > > sanction it.
> >
> > So do you motion to remove Games/Sports ?
> > Else if we are to keep it, what should fit in ?
>
> I'd first want to see the list of packages already in it...
Here the odds:
Sports: asciijump battleball billard-gl flying foobillard
(ski) (ball) (billard) (billard) (billard)
Simulation: achilles csmash flightgear gtkpool matrem xlife
(lifesim) (tennistable) (flightsim) (billard) (lifesim) (life game)
This is based on
<http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/menu/menufiles.tgz>
build with the very crude
<http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/menu/do.pl>
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
