Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184518: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.10.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 21:30:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 15:30:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.23] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tDnu-00025B-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:30:32 -0600
Received: from antares.cc.umanitoba.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.179.16.26])
by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2CLUCZi009333
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:30:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by antares.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.5+Sun/8.12.2) id h2CLUCQs010689;
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:30:12 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:30:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: footnote 6
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1033; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Footnote 6 says:
"4% of Debian packages [see Debconf stats] currently use debconf"
Two minor bugs, but should I really bother submitting different bug
reports?
http://kitenet.net/programs/debconf/stats/ says:
"Whups, you want to go here. " and points to
http://auric.debian.org/~joeyh/debconf-stats/
http://auric.debian.org/~joeyh/debconf-stats/data says:
03/12/2003, 780, 12269
Which is roughly 6.3574863477055994783600945472329. 6% is currently more
accurate than 4%.
Debian Policy Manual version 3.5.9.0 was created on 2003-03-07. (according
to the bottom of the TOC). On that date the data says:
03/07/2003, 783, 12281
Which is roughly 6.3757023043726080938034362022637, slightly higher. I
recommend if such a statistic is to be kept, it should be flagged and
updated upon revision of the document. (I know 2% is within "roughly",
that's why I set the severity to minor.)
Drew Daniels
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184518-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 17:53:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 15 12:53:20 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GMut-0008TF-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 12:53:19 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19GMoy-0003KR-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:12 -0400
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#184518: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.10.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:12 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
debian-policy_3.5.10.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.10.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.5.10.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.10.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.5.10.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.10.0_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debian-policy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:13:50 +0200
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.5.10.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents
Closes: 165063 167004 182792 184368 184507 184518 185985 187418 187420 187422
187567 189274 189654
Changes:
debian-policy (3.5.10.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
Josip:
* Fixed date, typos and added indentation in the virtual packages list,
closes: #182792.
* Changed the formatting of the link to the authors section to avoid
confusion in the debiandoc2txt output, closes: #185985.
* Fixed various typos, closes: #189274, #187418, #187422, #189654.
* Removed broken link to csh.whynot on CPAN, closes: #187567.
* Updated archive section list, closes: #187420.
* Stop attaching byhand tarballs, cf. bug #184082.
Manoj:
* Clarify x-terminal-emulator virtual package eligibility, in an
extention to an informative footnote. closes: Bug#165063
* Add 40 points, not 20, when the window manager is compliant with "The
Window Manager Specification Project". closes: Bug#167004
* Fixed reference to the debconf URL (we can change the URL as it
changes again, and I don't think any additional load would accrue
since people using the old URL were redirected to auric anyway).
closes: Bug#184518
* Inserted the word only in the package name section. closes: Bug#184368
* Amended the section about Prompting in maintainer scripts. Added a
footnote (quoting from the Jargon File) to explain what "by hand"
means in a computer context. closes: Bug#184507
Files:
bf7b4cccd7c0c7c4f33ac47c2f34460e 802 doc optional debian-policy_3.5.10.0.dsc
07c609f930042c481633932aaa9fd2ec 1629558 doc optional
debian-policy_3.5.10.0.tar.gz
ec4a069b9faaaa3504f0f0240246be9e 1254266 doc optional
debian-policy_3.5.10.0_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+vVCeC1RHoiANFZYRAs8nAKCRBjawRLGsfuq5C/ROQWHG5OnOqwCgiSkP
MpMQwvf7ekEcu5okzCuBnJ0=
=p6No
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
