ok on the GFDL, not agreeing on the man page for the GPL, which should be included in the base files.
Manoj Srivastava writes: > Hi, > > My stance has been that in order to be classified as common, > a license ought to be actually common -- say, a rule of thumb: be at > least used in 5% of the packages. > > The rationale behind adding licenses to the common-licenses > category is to prevent excessive duplication of the license text, and > prevent useless waste of disk space; this saving in disk space is > supposed to offset the additional effort to determine what the > license is. > > So, if there are at least 5% of the source packages (or > whatever number emrges from the debate that is sure to follow), we > can include the license into common license. A nice, objective > criteria for admission ;-)
