Your message dated Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:58:04 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184521: 2.4.3 exaggeration of bad Makefile edits
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 22:06:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 16:06:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.23] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tEMX-0007GA-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:06:13 -0600
Received: from antares.cc.umanitoba.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.179.16.26])
by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2CM66Zi007061
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:06:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by antares.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.5+Sun/8.12.2) id h2CM6660021326;
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:06:06 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:06:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2.4.3 exaggeration of bad Makefile edits
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1033; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
2.4.3 says:
"This makes it impossible for someone else to later reconfigure the
package." This is an incorrect statement and is likely an intentional
exaggeration.
A statement like:
"This could make it very difficult for someone else to later reconfigure
the package." is true and keeps an emphasis on the fact that it's a bad
idea. I replaced "makes" with "could make" and "impossible" with "very
difficult". The "very" was thrown in for emphasis.
Drew Daniels
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184521-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2003 18:01:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 12:01:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18wQpP-0001S8-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:01:15 -0600
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
h2LHw6fW031606;
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:58:07 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id
h2LHw4FY031602;
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:58:04 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50.17 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#184521: 2.4.3 exaggeration of bad Makefile edits
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Fri Mar 21 11:58:03 2003
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:58:04 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Drew
Scott Daniels's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:06:06 -0600 (CST)")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
This is a style issue. People who can't exercise common sense
have other problems with policy and development.
manoj
--
Lawful Dungeon Master -- and they're MY laws!
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
