Your message dated Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:45:05 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177523: debian-policy: mom says: no wasteful trailing
whitespace in logfiles, etc.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2003 08:11:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 20 02:11:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18aX1I-00009X-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 02:11:00 -0600
Received: from [210.203.44.49] (helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 18aX1E-0006nl-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:11:00 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18aPgZ-0000HJ-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:21:07 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: mom says: no wasteful trailing whitespace in
logfiles, etc.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:21:07 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: **
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.7.0
Severity: wishlist
i was told to send this
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: iptables: wasteful blanks added to syslog lines
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:18:11AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Lintian fellows: Suggest that maintainers check that their programs
> dont put wasteful blanks or ^M's in logfiles.
> I found lots with emacs' (setq-default show-trailing-whitespace t)
Lintian cannot check for this. Instead, you can file a wishlist bug on
debian-policy so that it gets noted in the Policy.
one example check is grep \ $ /var/log/syslog ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 4.5.2-1 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 4.5.2-1 GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177523-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2003 16:51:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 10:51:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com)
[12.107.230.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18wPjd-0003cJ-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:51:13 -0600
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
h2LGj8fW027697;
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:45:09 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id
h2LGj6Jt027693;
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:45:06 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.green-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50.17 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#177523: debian-policy: mom says: no wasteful trailing
whitespace in logfiles, etc.
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Debian Project
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Fri Mar 21 10:45:05 2003
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:45:05 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ("Dan Jacobson"'s message of
"Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:21:07 +0800")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
This is not a policy issue. Policy ought to be minimal set of
rules (and document current practice). If you can convince the
developers reference folks that this is good practice, perhaps it
belongs there.
manoj
--
"I wonder", he said to himself, "what's in a book while it's closed.
Oh, I know it's full of letters printed on paper, but all the same,
something must be happening, because as soon as I open it, there's a
whole story with people I don't know yet and all kinds of adventures
and battles." Bastian B. Bux
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
