On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:00:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, I'm not at all against splitting out -static packages on a
> case-by-case basis, as used to be done for X's libs. But there's nothing
> in policy to prohibit that anyway.
Section 11.2 says:
In general, libraries must have a shared version in the library
package and a static version in the development package.
Since it says "the development package", not "a development package", it
must mean libfoo-dev, in which case putting it in another package is a
violation of a "must" directive.
OTOH if you meant that packages can violate anything in policy on a
case-by-case basis, then yeah, the policy doesn't prohibit that.
But if Policy's directives have exceptions so obvious, then they could
probably use some fixing.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
