On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:32:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:33:10PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: >> > True. It could get away with tossing everything outside angulars or >> > inside brackets, though. The address can be mandated to stay 7bit for >> > now. >> >> At any rate, people shouldn't be putting raw Latin1 in these fields. > >Amen. 7-bit ASCII only.
Given that the control file is 7-bit pseudo-822, and has the same issues as mail headers (i.e. presented before any C-T header) is there any reason not to follow RFC2047 for the representation of non US-ASCII maintiner names? The alternative convention of a" or "a for รค is only really workable for ISO latin. --bod
