-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:57, Denis Barbier wrote:
[Initial request was to include author and/or homepage for package in the control file and as a result in the Packages file (IIRC)] > Please ignore my initial request, I no longer need extra fields in > debian/control and will think of a new file in source packages. > Thanks. Well, from a users point of view, I would (and do) really appreciate homepage links in the description of packages. This serves two purposes for me: 1. Have a source for additional information when I am in doubt wether this package should be installed. 2. Having the ability to check wether the package is uptodate in relation to the upstream package. While I understand that there are thousands of packages (hmm, dpkg -l only shows 1080 on my stable system, but there must be more than that) and that adding 40 bytes of URL data to each means multiple kilobytes (possibly more than 200kBytes) of additional data in the Packages file(s), it _does_ provide additional value to the user. And after all, the Packages file is primarily for the user (though this is through tools like apt/dpkg/dselect/aptitude). Also, the packages.d.o site could convert these URLs to links when displaying the package in question. The use of this is more obvious than in the Packages file itself I think. Still, it is generated from the same source. Regards, Sven Müller - - IT - Network&Infrastructure - - -- * Heinrich Berndes Haushaltstechnik GmbH & Co KG * Wiebelsheidestrasse 55, 59757 Arnsberg, Germany * Phone: +49 2932 475-282 / FAX: -325 * http://www.berndes.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE99gqlss2fOBI6SZ0RAn9RAJ447ue/rCLNpk0+bAXU5W2uPHTIrwCffT4G 18Pt5Z/dp2CczsaQB1zMx6g= =nrbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
