Your message dated Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:36:51 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-policy: provides the exception of static libraries.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2002 21:24:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 03 15:24:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 37.1.111.219.st.excite.co.jp (mail.gclab.org) [219.111.1.37]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 188SE3-0004oN-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 15:24:07 -0600
Received: from localhost (chulip [127.0.0.1])
by mail.gclab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E08D112AC6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 06:24:02 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 06:22:48 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: provides the exception of static libraries.
From: Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-key-URL:
http://keyring.debian.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9DB19904
X-fingerprint: 06B7 CF30 4EF6 224A E660 7A2A D900 A735 9DB1 9904
X-URL: http://www.gclab.org/~at/
X-Attribution: AT
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1rc1 on XEmacs 21.5-b5 (beets)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.7.1
Severity: normal
In Libraries section,
In general, libraries must have a shared version in the
library package and a static version in the development
package.
But, if libraries uses dlopen(3) internally, then some
programs links the static version, it doesn't work
correctly. because dlopen(3) doesn't try to resolve the
symbols in the static-linked program. in most cases, the
static version of such libraries is meaningless to be
provided.
So I think our policy needs to be added the exception of
such case.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux crocus 2.4.19 #1 Tue Aug 27 06:14:35 JST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP
Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 4.5.3-1 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 4.5.3-1 GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167604-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2002 16:56:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 10:56:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 37.1.111.219.st.excite.co.jp (mail.gclab.org) [219.111.1.37]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18GMXC-0008NG-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:56:35 -0600
Received: from localhost (chulip [127.0.0.1])
by mail.gclab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 801F91126D9; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:56:28 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:36:51 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debian-policy: provides the exception of static libraries.
From: Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-key-URL:
http://keyring.debian.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9DB19904
X-fingerprint: 06B7 CF30 4EF6 224A E660 7A2A D900 A735 9DB1 9904
X-URL: http://www.gclab.org/~at/
X-Attribution: AT
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1rc1 on XEmacs 21.5-b5 (beets)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_OBLIGATION,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:35:09 +0100,
>>>>> "BA" == Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BA> I believe you must just explain the situation to the submitter and close
BA> the bug. You have no obligation to add something to README.Debian.
BA> Please be kind with the bug submitter, but you have no obligation to
document
BA> the correct use of gcc/ld in your packages.
Sure. I think describing this issue to README.Debian will be
useful for people. so I will do that.
BA> There are two distinct problems when building code that use dlopen
BA> on ELF platform.
BA> 1) You must not link fully static,
BA> 2) you must link with -export-dynamic if you want to dlopen() symbol that
are
BA> statically linked.
BA> So I believe (ld expert please correct me) the right way to build something
BA> almost static is to do
BA> gcc -export-dynamic -o $@ t.c -Wl,-static -ldl -L. -lfoo -Wl,-Bdynamic
BA> This work with your testsuite.
s/-static/-Bstatic/ ?
BA> Anyway this is irrelevant to debian-policy, we should move it to
debian-devel.
Indeed. ok, I close this bug. if I have any question, I'll
post it to d-d.
Thanks,
--
Akira TAGOH : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Japan GNOME Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / GNOME-DB Project
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Red Hat, Inc.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Debian Project
