On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:36:58AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:06:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > IMO "dhcp-client" should be a virtual package Provided by dhcp3-client, > > udhcpc, and pump. > > I also concur. Does that mean that dhcp-client becomes > dhcp2-client?
No. It just means that it would become a mixed virtual package instead of a pure virtual package, in APT's terminology. > Does this not have far reaching effects? It would, if it were necessary. > Perhaps Progeny can kludge the etherconf package while I talk to > DHCP maintainers? Is this an acceptable compromise? Well, let's see first if there is any disagreement. Adding "Provides:" to 3 packages should not, in theory, be controversial. -- Branden Robinson | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/9C0BCBFB Consultant | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C Progeny Linux Systems | 72E8 0F42 191A 9C0B CBFB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
