> The irony is that the only reason to use which is to accomodate speed > freaks who want to be able to use non-bash shells. Now they get hit > by the bash startup time anyway. And those same speed freaks are > likely to be using ash, which has both "type" and "command -v".
I believe that Herbert's proposal solves this. > I once again recommend a deathmatch between ash and zsh fans. Let > the best shell win. bash doesn't even get to compete? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
