On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this meet your size criteria for fitting in /? Would it
> be acceptable for embedded systems?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I may be just stupid, but what does /usrness[1] have to do with embedded
systems? After all, if the embedded system has no disk space for (say)
X, it has no space for X on either / or /usr. Or is it a common case
in embedded systems to mount /usr/ on a much larger medium?
The "embedded systems" argument sounds *extremely* relevant for Essentiality
(we've talked about this), but completely *irrelevant* for /usrness?
1. Kudos to Branden for coming up with this much-needed word.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
