On Sun, 12 May 2002, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > Ok, then it is just a question of naming. Say my foo library can be > compiled to .class files and GCJ .so files. One option is to > package both in libfoo-java, which would be architecture specific. > But if you want to split them into an architecture-specific and an > architecture-independent package, what do you call them? libfoo-java > and libfoo-gcj-java?
Btw, kaffe has gcj support, and can load gcj-compile .so files, or something like that. Current cvs appears broken, however. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
