>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:33:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Trust you guys to have a discussion on serious severities
>> after I went to bed. I note in scrollback that the very existence
>> was of the severity was called into question, and no one seemed to
>> remember the rationale for it.
Branden> You appear to have overlooked the fact that neither aj nor I
Branden> felt that the serious severity should be removed, therefore
Branden> most of your complains are off the mark, IMO.
Strawman. The rationale I presented argues for creating a
severity to use for violations of policy. The point was to allow for
violations of must directives to be flagged as problems in
themselves, potentially release critical, thereby acknowledging the
importance of Debian policy for packages (IMHO policy is the major
difference between the solidity of a Debian machine vs other
distributions).
Branden> Since you want to drag this out in the public forum of debian-policy,
Branden> I'll post some relevant hunks of IRC log.
Talk about hypocrisy. This is the same person who ranted
about lack of transparecy when he was not in the innner circle, but
has a problem with the DPL, RM, and a DPL candidate discussing a
corner stone of Debian like the BTS being dragged into the light of
day.
Pardon me for trying to bring the people who do not IRC into
the conversation.
manoj
--
Remember that whatever misfortune may be your lot, it could only be
worse in Cleveland. National Lampoon, "Deteriorata"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
