(Taking this off-line.)

Well, had you read through the note properly, you would have
noticed that Webster's 3rd does recognize it, while the 2nd
doesn't; it's a pretty safe bet that the 3rd came after the
2nd. :-)

IIRC, the 2nd was proscriptive, and the 3rd descriptive, with
many purists lamenting the change.

-John

Reply via email to