On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:41:58AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Correct; "conffile" is a technical term (it means something which > appears in debian/conffiles) and appears in <tt>...</tt>, the 's' is a > plural ending added on. I'm not sure if this is correct usage or not; > if there is any concensus, I'm not at all bothered about changing > every <tt>conffile</tt>s to <tt>conffiles</tt>.
I think the current usage is more correct. Not necessarily in typographical terms, but then typographical tradition would have us tell people that in vi lines are deleted with "dd." I prefer semantical correctness :) -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html
