It's no different. They both compile c code. Maybe a little different, but their command line interface is 99% equivalent. gcc3 is just closer to ANSI.
On Friday 22 June 2001 01:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:44:36AM -0400, Warren Turkal wrote: > > I meant only to suggest you reopen it. I didn't want to do it. > > That is your job. I am sorry about that. > > If what you say truly makes sense then you better tell the > > maintainers of jdk1.1-dev and friends to get rid of the javac > > symlinks in /etc/alternatives because it may cause java stuff not > > to compile. > > That's a different issue. Those Java compilers all actually attempt > to provide the exact same interface. Gcc 2.95 and 3.0 do not.
