Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:30:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-policy_3.5.5.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2001 06:20:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 13 00:20:51 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from services.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14ciAt-0003kn-00; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:20:51 -0600
Received: from gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [128.114.49.60])
by services.cse.ucsc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA23282
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:20:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id WAA16950;
Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:20:49 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu: ben set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
X-Face: -eDkx0I[vNsajBStK^((#;s#wZr+;?Up|;+Zw5JOl]'fINagA)&i4=$2WI'z4U!h0>;A3ON
RW{7<n^q2ZN?'5kU;[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@O>o6imB12xD.pSBhFoqTuF{>b9[K[R\0h=c]Yy6h_R"=Ogv~9
EsgE,9_6?%yFG'C6'L#JBw%9R*]UqA=|&CCMPsas#<U/%IY{*Q_"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
4Oji?i':(}%$
From: Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 Mar 2001 22:20:49 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 23
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: wishlist
The man page for dh_suidregister says that any package containing a
SUID/SGID binary no longer needs to use suidregister, instead, users
can use dpkg-statoverride as necessary.
Policy (section 11.9, "Permissions and Owners") doesn't talk about
either way, but it should mention that suidregister should no longer
be used; also, that packages previously using suidregister should
Conflict: with suidmanager (<< 0.50).
If I understand dpkg-statoverride correctly, mentioning that
dpkg-statoverride is not to be called from maintainer post/pre
install scripts should also be added.
Ben
--
Brought to you by the letters P and B and the number 15.
"It should be illegal to yell 'Y2K' in a crowded economy."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 89473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2001 23:34:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 07 18:34:01 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [::ffff:216.234.231.6]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1589Ht-0002qi-00; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:34:01 -0500
Received: (qmail 3860 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2001 23:31:27 -0000
Received: from mserv1e.vianw.co.uk (195.102.240.97)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2001 23:31:27 -0000
Received: from [195.102.197.85] (helo=polya)
by mserv1e.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
id 1589Er-0007Ry-00; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:30:54 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 1589Eo-000103-00; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:30:50 +0100
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:30:50 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-policy_3.5.5.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:23:07 -0400
From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy_3.5.5.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
To: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Installing:
debian-policy_3.5.5.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.5.0.tar.gz
policy-process.txt.gz byhand
libc6-migration.txt byhand
fhs.txt byhand
debian-policy_3.5.5.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.5.0_all.deb
perl-policy.txt.gz byhand
menu-policy.txt.gz byhand
mime-policy.txt.gz byhand
virtual-package-names-list.txt byhand
upgrading-checklist.txt byhand
fhs-2.1.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.pdf.gz byhand
menu-policy.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
mime-policy.html.tar.gz byhand
debconf_specification.html byhand
debconf_specification.txt.gz byhand
policy.txt.gz byhand
policy-process.html.tar.gz byhand
perl-policy.html.tar.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.5.5.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.5.0.dsc
policy.ps.gz byhand
Changes: debian-policy (3.5.5.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fixed up incorrect entries in the changelog (there was an erroneous
3.5.0.1 revision which never happened; it has now been correctly
merged with the 3.5.3.0 changelog entry)
* Add section numbers to upgrading-checklist for all revisions from
3.0.0 onwards
* Complete rewrite (and renumbering) of sections 9.1 and 9,2
* This time *really* include the HTML version of the FHS
* Added doc-base support for all of the HTML files
* Added several more files to the byhand list and rewrote chunks of
debian/rules to do this
* Add patched versions of debiandoc-sgml stuff to source package until
patches are incorporated upstream
* Versioned Build-Depend on debiandoc-sgml for fixed Text.pm
* Improved mkdir example in 10.1.2 closes: Bug#92744
* Made the "where examples live" entry in the upgrading-checklist
clearer (add "for use by scripts")
* Add a dpkg-statoverride description section closes: Bug#89473
* Fix the ldconfig usage description (remove "only if")
closes: Bug#89674
* Clarification of package priority issues vis-a-vis the X Windows
system closes: Bug#91249
* Enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy closes: Bug#91252
* Minor changes to X app-defaults policy closes: Bug#91259
* Clarification of X policy in respect to FHS closes: Bug#91260
* OpenMotif has the same rules as OSF/Motif closes: Bug#91261
* The X Font policy rewrite closes: Bug#91257
* The "man" program is no longer guaranteed to read header information
to find alternative manpage names closes: Bug#94995
* Correction to meaning of Standards-Version closes: Bug#97072
* Split section 12.8 (X Window System) into subsections for readability
* Plug-ins != shared libraries (at last) closes: Bug#66023
* Add packaging manual remnants to policy document as appendices, and
mention this in control file closes: Bug#95906
* Clarification in Perl policy closes: Bug#98712
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 66023 89473 89674 91249 91252 91257 91259 91260
91261 92744 94995 95906 97072 98712
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
----- End forwarded message -----
