On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 01:58:37PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > > Maintainers are being encouradged to use UTF-8, having in mind the general
> > > tendency toward unified character encoding.
> > 
> > Nice things these general tendencies... in my country we still have problems
> > using ISO 8859-2 because Windows 1250 has polluted everything. Adding
> > another one to the pile is likely to screw things up even more. <sigh>
> 
> and in my country, we have the same, plus 1 more common (though already
> dying) MS DOS encoding, plus two more (thanks god already dead) pre-msdos 
> encodings, plus one MS DOS encoding that was "officially given from IBM"
> but never really caught up, plus CE-Mac encoding (fortunately Macintoshes
> were a really rare beasts here), plus this university had a lot of
> DEC terminals with its own CE encoding (reading mail archives from the past
> is FUN, there was no Content-Encoding invented)

Oh, yes, there are those lame things here, too... replacing @ with ¾ and
other insane things. Luckily they're rather rare, and becoming more rare all
the time.

> There has to be an end to this.

Yes, but I doubt we are going to be able to put an end to it.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply via email to