On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:12:30PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > > and there are cross-compilers, whose time-honored standard locations > > have been completely banned by the FHS.
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:22:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Right. But again: the FHS doesn't say anything useful about > cross-compilers. What? I agree that the banning use of their standard locations is certainly not useful. However, it's a major red flag for any treatment of FHS compliance as a good thing. Or have I completely missed something? -- Raul
