Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> - A change in the policy to remove the obsolete /usr/doc symlinks. > >This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition. >Now, if we're really down to 253 packages that use /usr/doc (with no >symlink), then maybe it's time. But, unfortunately, that number, 253, >measures *claimed* compliance, not actual compliance. > >Now, my poking around suggests that there are actually far *fewer* >than 253 packages still using /usr/doc. And if that's true, then it's >definitely time to remove the symlinks. But it might be nice to have >some hard facts, rather than speculation based on unreliable claims >made by inattentive package maintainers.
http://qa.debian.org/fhs.html ... which is down to 109 /usr/doc-using packages on i386. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
