retitle [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules thanks
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > See bug#72335 (accepted). How can this be accepted if there is no record of a second in the BTS? There are a few `this is a good idea' remarks, but no official second (and no signed mail at all). Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
