Brian, I don't consider make to be a language. ;)
Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++(++++)>$ UL++++>$ P--- L++>++$ E+ W+(-) N+ o? K? w---() !O !M !V PS+(++)>+ PE-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI(+) D++ G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ On 1 Mar 2001, Brian May wrote: > >>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alexander> My point: Using interpreted languages in rules files > Alexander> should be avoided. Otherwise thou canst not build eg > Alexander> python without already having python installed... and > Alexander> you get a chicken-and-egg problem. Ouch. > > You don't consider make to be an interpreted language? > -- > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
