On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:39:22AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > For inclusion in non-free, which is more significant: access to source > > code or 100% FHS compliance?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:44:52AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: > The latter. But note that non-free is not part of Debian. Ok. But note that dpkg could better support FHS in its treatment of packages of /usr/local/bin/. > Also, see http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq#djb That's a rant. It's also out of date -- looks like it was written a year or two ago. Most of his comments on redistribution are incorrect. Thanks, -- Raul
