On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote: > > But is it really a common license? Perhaps dh_make's template manual page > > should be corrected instead. > > I understand and appreciate the desirability of keeping the base-files > package small. But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes > common, and putting it into the common-licenses directory is one step toward > making that happen.
I'm not really concerned about base-files' size, compressed legalese is tiny :) I just think that a license first needs to become common and then be added to that directory, not the other way around. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
