On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Rando Christensen wrote: <mmm. quoting myself..>
> look a little harder:
>
> xanielle:/bin% strings ls
> <Much snippy here>
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE.
>
Noticing something I missed when I sent this - this doesn't mention that
it's the GPL, nor does it say where to get it besides ``the source''. Is
that a violation of the GPL?
That seems to imply to me that, according to official GNU software,
Referencing the source on a system where it's assumed to be available
counts as NOT violating the GPL.
Just a thought, if a wildly inaccurate one.
/-----------------------------------------------------------\
< <What Am I Doing? I'm Quietly Judging You. >
< <Rando Christensen> >
< <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
