On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:36:12PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Mmkay... 9 Gb mirror pulse... that will work. (not) > > > > That's a seperate issue that does not pertain to the UUID's. Let's discuss > > this later. > > Er, so far the only reason to have a UUID that has held up to scrutiny > revolves around whatever your signing plan is - if your signing plan is > going to fail because in requires a 9 gig mirror pulse then we don't > need UUIDs!
As I said, I am not discussing the signing scheme, which is to mean it isn't ready for proposing yet. Please don't make assumptions on it without seeing it. > Post your scheme and we can evaluate it (and its required UUIDs) as a > package. UUID's extend beyond that proposal, and that proposal is not done yet. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
