On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 07:41:24AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > This would require lots of changes to packages. > so we change lots of packages.
Sure. But if anyone can think of a solution that gives the same results but doesn't require changes to lots of packages, that'd be better. So is that last wording sensible? Shall we make a proposal and get it in policy? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
pgpD1rHkCclbk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
