Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Joey> But my point is that this is an implementation detail. I can > Joey> envision systems that have no point of return, and can always > Joey> be rolled back (think journaling filesystems). > > I guess I do not agree. At this point, the details of > mainainer file call protocols are standard interfaces to the > packjaging system that packagers must be aware of, and can depend on > not to change udner them.
Um, I'm not talking about the parameters passed to the scripts or their ordering. I'm talking about asides documenting internal dpkg limitations, that should not be put into policy. -- see shy jo
