Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:28:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in debian-policy 3.2.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2000 12:13:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 27291 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2000 12:13:09 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2000 12:13:09 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [158.49.8.233])
        by pizarro.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA10371
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:12:53 +0200
Received: from cantor.unex.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [158.49.18.105])
        by guadiana.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA24034
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:12:52 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:10:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist

The following proposal tries to address cases like Bug #34294.

\begin{proposal}
Do not initialize a text database by using the conffile mechanism.
\end{proposal}

Rationale: We should try to reduce prompting to a minimum during upgrades.
99,999% users will always say "No" to dpkg prompt. In this case it is 
better not to prompt and assume that "No" is what almost everybody
wants.

I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 61308-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2000 11:28:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 28 06:28:30 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mserv1a.vianw.co.uk [::ffff:195.102.240.34] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13TN5W-0006tx-00; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 06:28:26 -0500
Received: from [195.102.196.197] (helo=polya)
        by mserv1a.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #63)
        id 13TN5Q-0006Lf-00; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:28:21 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 13TN5A-0004eC-00; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:28:04 +0100
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:28:04 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Closed in debian-policy 3.2.1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks to Manoj for closing all of these bugs in debian-policy version
3.2.1.0.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to