[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Greenland) wrote on 21.08.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> right now I don't know *where* to look after installing foo-doc. /var/lib/dpkg/info/foo-doc.list. > (Yes, both of the above points are rather facetious...) Me too. > > Besides, it would be nice to have many rfc packages: doc-rfc-mail, > > doc-rfc-web, all of them puting packages in /usr/share/doc/rfc. And > > there could be symlinkf pointing to the most recent versions of > > standards: /usr/share/doc/rfc/HTTP would point to rfc2616.txt. > > This is a good argument. Implementing it might, however, need someone to come up with a bright idea for a script to divide the RFCs accordingly. I tried several ties and failed. Except for the symliinks; I think I know how to do that (for those protocol names found in STD 1), and it seems like a good idea. >I think combined with Colin's idea that it be > called /usr/share/doc/RFC (embracing and extending the HOWTO example) I > could be in favor of it, as it avoids the package namespace. Certainly looks acceptable to me, if people can live with that. MfG Kai
