On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:30:07AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Ah, I see what you're saying. You're talking about the case where the
> package actually *contains* the hard link, rather than, say, making it
> in the post-inst. Yes, that will definitely break badly.
>
> In that case, I suggest changing the first line of the proposal from:
>
> A package may not make hard links to conffiles.
>
> to:
>
> A package may not contain hard links to conffiles.
I think we'll say both ;-)
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
