On 16-Jun-00, 14:32 (CDT), Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have always considered the copyright file as the place to go when > one needed to determine what has been done to the upstream sources by > the Debian maintainer. (In one sense, it is a summary of the .diff.gz > file). It is certainly easier to get that information from the text > that is supposed to be recorded in the copyright file than it is to wade > through pages and pages of confusing changelog entries.
I agree that the summary should not be part of the changelog, but it never made sense to me that it was in the copyright file, either. The obvious place to me would be README.Debian. One of the problems with putting it in the copyright file is that for packages that don't use one of the common licenses, you have to modify the upstream copyright file, which feels like a bad thing to me. Steve
