On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 02:30:04PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > | Is there any naming convention for debian-specific documentation > > | packages? I would have expected such things to be called debian-blah, > > | similar to debian-policy. > > > > What do folks think? > > I've long wanted to see that! The primary packages I'd like to see > change their names are: > packaging-manual, developers-reference, maint-guide, doc-debian
To debian-packaging-manual, debian-developers-reference, debian-maint-guide, debian-doc? The last one would be okay (although then it would be named differently than doc-linux*, which was the original, I guess), but the other three are way too long. (and yes, that's as much as a cosmetical remark as is the wish to rename them :) Besides, if we rename them, they wouldn't get automatically upgraded anymore, unless we put dummy packages in place, which is Ugly(TM). -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
