On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Two things I'd like to see done with the virtual package system:
>
> 1. Define APIs for all virtual packages.
>
> 2. Tie virtual packages to the alternatives system, somehow.
>
> The former emphasises the fact that, unless you have *some* sort of
> common API (no matter how fuzzy), you don't really have a virtual
> package. The latter may be pie-in-the-sky, but could be interesting.
But a package which Recommends: www-browser needs no standard
interface whatsoever, for example. I think that virtual packages go
beyond alternatives.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
